Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
A general proof of integer Rényi QNEC
arXiv
Authors: Tanay Kibe, Pratik Roy
Year
2026
Paper ID
63950
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
123
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Rényi quantum null energy condition conjectures that the second null shape variation of the sandwiched Rényi divergence (SRD) of an excited state relative to the vacuum is non-negative in local Poincaré-invariant quantum field theory, giving a one-parameter generalization of the quantum null energy condition (QNEC). We prove Rényi QNEC for all integer Rényi parameters ngeq 2 for von Neumann algebras carrying a half-sided modular inclusion structure. The only assumption on the excited state is finiteness of its SRD relative to the vacuum. Concretely, for any σ-finite von Neumann algebra with such an inclusion, we prove log-convexity, under the associated null-translation semigroup, of the Kosaki Ln norm of any normal positive functional with finite Ln norm.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Rényi quantum null energy condition conjectures that the second null shape variation of the sandwiched Rényi divergence (SRD) of an excited state relative to the vacuum is...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.