Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Experimental subdiffraction source discrimination enabled by spatial demultiplexing and single-photon detectors
arXiv
Authors: Luigi Santamaria Amato, Danilo Triggiani, Cosmo Lupo
Year
2026
Paper ID
63918
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
204
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We experimentally demonstrate a universal, parameter-independent test for asymmetric source discrimination. The test allows us to discriminate faint sources well beyond the diffraction limit by exploiting spatial mode demultiplexing (SPADE) and single-photon detectors. Our test yields a rate of false negatives well below what can be achieved by diffraction-limited direct imaging. Our tabletop experimental setup is inspired by the problem of exoplanet detection, where one aims at detecting the presence of a faint source in the proximity of a brighter one. We present a complete theory, modelling arbitrary modal crosstalk, and collect data across a range of values for the source separations and intensity ratios. We show that SPADE retains an advantage over direct imaging in the relevant regime of small separations and low intensity ratios. Remarkably, we identify an experimentally accessible crosstalk threshold Cthsimeq 0.1 below which the exponential rate of false negatives stays well below that of direct imaging. For example, for crosstalk of 10-2, SPADE needs up to one order of magnitude fewer photons than direct imaging to achieve the same error rate. These results demonstrate that SPADE offers an effective methodology for subdiffraction asymmetric hypothesis testing, under realistic imperfections and crosstalk, paving the way to photon-starved imaging tasks.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We experimentally demonstrate a universal, parameter-independent test for asymmetric source discrimination.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.