Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

mathcal{O}(n) alternative to Quantum Fourier Transform with efficient neural net classical post-processing

arXiv
Authors: Kaiming Bian, Zujin Wen, Oscar Dahlsten

Year

2026

Paper ID

63865

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

143

Citations

0

Abstract

The Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) is required by hidden subgroup problem (HSP) algorithms, including Shor's algorithm for factoring. The circuit depth of the QFT remains challenging for near-term hardware. To find shallower alternatives we identify two properties that are exploited by the QFT to enable HSP. Firstly, the shift invariance of the QFT allows for the removal of a random overall shift. Secondly, the QFT retains information about the hidden subgroup generator accessible in the measurement outcomes. We quantify that information via the discrete Fisher information. We construct a family of shallow circuits using Hadamards and controlled-Phase gates, HP-L circuits, that we prove preserve shift invariance. Numerical analysis shows these circuits retain exponentially growing Fisher information. The mathcal{O}(n) HP-1 can replace the mathcal{O}\(n2\) QFT in Shor's algorithm, as demonstrated numerically, with an efficient neural network implementing classical post-processing.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63865 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-03 19:37:59

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.