Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Open quantum dynamics without Complete Positivity: a criticism

arXiv
Authors: Fabio Benatti, Dariusz Chruściński, Saverio Pascazio

Year

2026

Paper ID

63786

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The requirement of complete positivity is very often regarded as a fundamental consistency condition for the description of open quantum dynamics. We critically examine this requirement and discuss both its physical motivations and its limitations. We analyze proposals based on restricting the domain of non-completely positive maps to subsets of compatible initial states. Using isotropic states as a concrete example, we show that such domain restrictions become increasingly severe with growing system dimension, revealing an intrinsic weakness of the compatibility-based approach.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The requirement of complete positivity is very often regarded as a fundamental consistency condition for the description of open quantum dynamics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63786 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.