Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Strategy optimization for quantum conference key agreement in asymmetric star networks
arXiv
Authors: Janka Memmen, Julia Kunzelmann, Nathan Walk, Jens Eisert, Julius Wallnöfer
Year
2026
Paper ID
63783
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
130
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The distribution of entangled states is a core task for quantum networks facilitating quantum communication, and the use of multipartite entangled states comes with its own set of considerations. In this work, we analyze a quantum conference agreement protocol based on GHZ states in a network with a central station to which multiple clients are connected. Using comprehensive numerical simulations, we investigate how minor variations in the scenario-such as the number of parties, the number of memories, and asymmetric distances from the central station-can drastically influence the performance of the protocol. In particular, we demonstrate that it is crucial to adjust the strategy by optimizing cutoff times. From a broader perspective, we argue that numerical simulations are an indispensable tool for protocol design for devising realistic schemes for quantum communication.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The distribution of entangled states is a core task for quantum networks facilitating quantum communication, and the use of multipartite entangled states comes with its own set...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.