Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
A Review of Galois Qudits
arXiv
Authors: Adam Wills
Year
2026
Paper ID
63771
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
193
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Galois qudits are q-dimensional quantum systems whose choice of Pauli group encodes the arithmetic of some finite field mathbb{F}q. They differ from the more familiar modular qudit, which are the same quantum system but whose choice of Pauli group are the clock and shift operators, which encode the arithmetic of integer addition and multiplication modulo q. Galois qudits are a useful mathematical construct that allow us to leverage the mathematical tools that are native to the larger qudit while only physically building smaller qudits. In particular, a Galois qudit of dimension q = 2s is exactly the same thing as a collection of s qubits, not only in its Hilbert space, but also in its Pauli group, and Clifford hierarchy. This formalism has found a lot of utility recently in constructing quantum error-correcting codes over qubits with useful properties. In this review, we build on existing literature to collect and formalise facts and proofs about Galois qudits over binary extension fields. We define them and their Clifford hierarchies, describe what it means to measure their Pauli operators, describe their stabiliser tableaux, formally define qudit-to-qubit mappings, and finally describe quantum Reed-Solomon codes.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Galois qudits are q-dimensional quantum systems whose choice of Pauli group encodes the arithmetic of some finite field mathbbFq.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.