Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Signatures of quantum noise in the operation of Deutsch's algorithm
arXiv
Authors: Małgorzata Strzałka, Katarzyna Roszak
Year
2026
Paper ID
63764
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We use Deutsch's algorithm as a stand in for more complex quantum algorithms in order to determine how quantum properties of an environment manifest themselves in results that can be obtained on quantum computers. We model pure dephasing in two different ways; one keeps the full density matrix of the qubits and environments (quantum) while the other uses Kraus operators (classical). We find that a single run of the algorithm yields the same effect in both cases, but running the algorithm twice leads to stark differences. Taking correlations and interplay between different decoherence processes into account leads to a slowing of decoherence effects for balanced functions. For constant functions, the effect is much more pronounced, and there is a qualitative change in the dependence of measurement outcomes on decoherence. We present results obtained on one of the IBM Quantum processors, which fully reproduce the predicted effect regardless of the assumptions made in the derivation. We further illustrate the findings on NV center spin qubits, which show more complex behavior due to a small size of the environment.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We use Deutsch's algorithm as a stand in for more complex quantum algorithms in order to determine how quantum properties of an environment manifest themselves in results that...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.