Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Developing a photon-number-resolving detection chain for quantum communication protocols involving mesoscopic states of light
arXiv
Authors: Alex Pozzoli, Stefano Carsi, Andrea Abba, Alessia Allevi
Year
2026
Paper ID
63731
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
82
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present the characterization of a photon-number-resolving detection chain based on Silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) coupled to a 14 bit, 1 Gs\s digital acquisition system embedding an FPGA-based signal processing pipeline that performs real-time baseline subtraction, digital deconvolution, and charge integration. Three SiPM models manufactured by Hamamatsu are tested and compared in the mesoscopic intensity regime using both classical coherent states and quantum twin-beam states, enabling a systematic investigation of the effects of pixel pitch, pile-up, and photon detection efficiency on the detector performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present the characterization of a photon-number-resolving detection chain based on Silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) coupled to a 14 bit, 1 Gss digital acquisition system...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.