Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Precision and Privacy in Distributed Quantum Sensing: A Quantum Fisher Information Duality
arXiv
Authors: Farhad Farokhi
Year
2026
Paper ID
63720
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
124
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We establish a quantum Fisher information (QFI) duality for distributed quantum sensor networks with local phase encoding. For any N-qubit probe state, where N denotes the number of sensors, FQ\(boldsymbol{w}^→p boldsymbolθ\) + FQ\(boldsymbol{v}^→p boldsymbolθ\) leq N for all unit orthogonal sensing directions boldsymbol{w} and boldsymbol{v}, with equality for all equatorial states when N=2 and for Greenberger--Horne--Zeilinger (GHZ) states when Ngeq 2. Heisenberg-limited precision for direction boldsymbol{w}, FQ\(boldsymbol{w}^→p boldsymbolθ\)=N, saturates the bound and simultaneously forces zero QFI for all other independent directions. This can be interpreted as the condition for parameter privacy in distributed quantum sensing: attaining Heisenberg-limited precision for the sensing target renders all alternative privacy-intrusive estimations impossible.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We establish a quantum Fisher information (QFI) duality for distributed quantum sensor networks with local phase encoding.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.