Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Geometric Construction of Optimal Teleportation Witnesses

arXiv
Authors: Yanning Jia, Fenzhuo Guo, Mengxuan Bai, Mengyan Li, Haifeng Dong, Fei Gao

Year

2026

Paper ID

63686

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

114

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Not all entangled states are useful for quantum teleportation. We present a geometric method to construct optimal teleportation witnesses, which provide operational necessary and sufficient criteria for identifying the teleportation usefulness of arbitrary two-qudit entangled states. Specifically, by developing a two-layer iterative cutting-plane algorithm to solve the shortest distance problem from the target state ρ to the convex set S of useless states, we obtain the projection point σ^* in S and then construct the optimal teleportation witness from the projection geometry. Moreover, the shortest distance D(ρ) obtained during this construction also serves as a necessary and sufficient criterion for usefulness. We apply our method to identify the teleportation usefulness of three classes of entangled states.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Not all entangled states are useful for quantum teleportation.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63686 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.