Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Geometric Origin of the Non-Adiabaticity Parameter and Self-Limiting Instability in Driven Nonlinear Systems
arXiv
Authors: A. M. Tishin
Year
2026
Paper ID
63660
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
100
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We establish that the non-adiabaticity parameter has a direct geometric interpretation as the instantaneous evolution speed of a driven quantum state in projective Hilbert space under the Fubini Study metric. In contrast to conventional asymptotic approaches, the proposed framework provides a strictly local geometric criterion that allows non-adiabatic instability and its nonlinear suppression to be evaluated continuously at each stage of the driven evolution. We further show that an occupation-dependent nonlinear regulator Usuppresses the effective geometric evolution speed, leading to bounded low-occupancy dynamics. The resulting crossover parameter provides a compact criterion for self-limited non-adiabatic instability in driven nonlinear bosonic systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We establish that the non-adiabaticity parameter has a direct geometric interpretation as the instantaneous evolution speed of a driven quantum state in projective Hilbert...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.