Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Benchmarking Verification Validation
Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering
Quantum Chemistry
Interpretable machine learning and molecular simulations identify natural pancreatic lipase inhibitors and hydrophobic hotspot residues.
PubMed
Authors: Zhao Y, Wang J, Yu S, Zhuo X, Li X, Chen Z, Liang G
Year
2026
Paper ID
63553
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
127
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Pancreatic lipase (PL) is a validated peripheral target for limiting dietary fat absorption, yet structurally diverse natural inhibitors remain scarce. We assembled a PL inhibitor dataset from public resources and trained a random-forest classifier using PubChem fingerprints test AUC = 0.9134 to prioritize a natural product library. After drug-likeness and toxicity filtering, docking, and experimental validation, three hits were identified: Licochalcone C IC = 62.05 ± 1.77 μM, Neoglycyrol IC = 95.21 ± 0.57 μM, and Notopterol IC = 104.27 ± 3.19 μM. Interaction fingerprint and molecular dynamics analyses showed that binding was dominated by hydrophobic interactions, with Val260/Ala261 acting as key residues across the three PL-ligand complexes. Dissociation free-energy profiles from steered molecular dynamics and umbrella sampling were consistent with the potency ranking. Collectively, this data-driven pipeline identified new natural PL inhibitors and provided residue-level insights for further optimization.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Pancreatic lipase (PL) is a validated peripheral target for limiting dietary fat absorption, yet structurally diverse natural inhibitors remain scarce.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.