Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Optimal Clifford Initial States for Ising Hamiltonians

arXiv
Authors: Bikrant Bhattacharyya, Gokul Subramanian Ravi

Year

2023

Paper ID

6333

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

131

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Evaluating quantum circuits is currently very noisy. Therefore, developing classical bootstraps that help minimize the number of times quantum circuits have to be executed on noisy quantum devices is a powerful technique for improving the practicality of Variational Quantum Algorithms. CAFQA is a previously proposed classical bootstrap for VQAs that uses an initial ansatz that reduces to Clifford operators. CAFQA has been shown to produce fairly accurate initialization for VQA applied to molecular chemistry Hamiltonians. Motivated by this result, in this paper we seek to analyze the Clifford states that optimize the cost function for a new type of Hamiltonian, namely Transverse Field Ising Hamiltonians. Our primary result connects the problem of finding the optimal CAFQA initialization to a submodular minimization problem which in turn can be solved in polynomial time.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Evaluating quantum circuits is currently very noisy.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6333 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.