Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Optimal Clifford Initial States for Ising Hamiltonians
arXiv
Authors: Bikrant Bhattacharyya, Gokul Subramanian Ravi
Year
2023
Paper ID
6333
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Evaluating quantum circuits is currently very noisy. Therefore, developing classical bootstraps that help minimize the number of times quantum circuits have to be executed on noisy quantum devices is a powerful technique for improving the practicality of Variational Quantum Algorithms. CAFQA is a previously proposed classical bootstrap for VQAs that uses an initial ansatz that reduces to Clifford operators. CAFQA has been shown to produce fairly accurate initialization for VQA applied to molecular chemistry Hamiltonians. Motivated by this result, in this paper we seek to analyze the Clifford states that optimize the cost function for a new type of Hamiltonian, namely Transverse Field Ising Hamiltonians. Our primary result connects the problem of finding the optimal CAFQA initialization to a submodular minimization problem which in turn can be solved in polynomial time.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Evaluating quantum circuits is currently very noisy.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.