Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Deriving a kinetic uncertainty relation for piecewise deterministic processes: from classical to quantum

arXiv
Authors: Fei Liu

Year

2021

Paper ID

63179

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

N/A

Abstract

From the perspective of Markovian piecewise deterministic processes (PDPs), we investigate the derivation of a kinetic uncertainty relation (KUR), which was originally proposed in Markovian open quantum systems. First, stationary distributions of classical PDPs are explicitly constructed. Then, a tilting method is used to derive a rate functional of large deviations. Finally, based on an improved approximation scheme, we recover the KUR. These classical results are directly extended to the open quantum systems. We use a driven two-level quantum system to exemplify the quantum results.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • From the perspective of Markovian piecewise deterministic processes (PDPs), we investigate the derivation of a kinetic uncertainty relation (KUR), which was originally proposed...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63179 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.