Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Loschmidt echo approach to Krylov-subspace approximation error estimation

arXiv
Authors: Julian Ruffinelli, Emiliano Fortes, Martín Larocca, Diego A. Wisniacki

Year

2021

Paper ID

63051

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

103

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The Krylov subspace method is a standard approach to approximate quantum evolution, allowing to treat systems with large Hilbert spaces. Although its application is general, and suitable for many-body systems, estimation of the committed error is involved. This makes it difficult to automate its use. In this paper, we solve this problem by realizing that such error can be regarded as a Loschmidt echo in a tight-binding Hamiltonian. We show that the different time-regimes of the approximation can be understood using simple physical ideas. More importantly, we obtain computationally cheap error bounds that describe with high precision the actual error in the approximation.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Krylov subspace method is a standard approach to approximate quantum evolution, allowing to treat systems with large Hilbert spaces.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63051 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.