Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Transfer of Fisher Information in Quantum Postselection Metrology

arXiv
Authors: Zi-Rui Zhong, Xia-Lin Su, Xiang-Ming Hu, Ke-Xuan Chen, Hui-Lin Xu, Yan Zhang, Qing-Lin Wu

Year

2024

Paper ID

6305

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Postselected weak measurement has shown significant potential for detecting small physical effects due to its unique weak-value-amplification phenomenon. Previous works suggest that Heisenberg-limit precision can be attained using only the optical coherent states. However, the measurement object is the distribution of postselection, limiting the practical applicability. Here, we demonstrate that the output photons can also reach the quantum scale by utilizing the Fisher information transfer effect. In addition, we consider the insertion of a power-recycling cavity and demonstrate its positive impact on the distribution of postselection. Our results enhance the quantum metrological advantages of the postselection strategy and broaden its application scope.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Postselected weak measurement has shown significant potential for detecting small physical effects due to its unique weak-value-amplification phenomenon.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6305

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.