Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Transfer of Fisher Information in Quantum Postselection Metrology
arXiv
Authors: Zi-Rui Zhong, Xia-Lin Su, Xiang-Ming Hu, Ke-Xuan Chen, Hui-Lin Xu, Yan Zhang, Qing-Lin Wu
Year
2024
Paper ID
6305
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Postselected weak measurement has shown significant potential for detecting small physical effects due to its unique weak-value-amplification phenomenon. Previous works suggest that Heisenberg-limit precision can be attained using only the optical coherent states. However, the measurement object is the distribution of postselection, limiting the practical applicability. Here, we demonstrate that the output photons can also reach the quantum scale by utilizing the Fisher information transfer effect. In addition, we consider the insertion of a power-recycling cavity and demonstrate its positive impact on the distribution of postselection. Our results enhance the quantum metrological advantages of the postselection strategy and broaden its application scope.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Postselected weak measurement has shown significant potential for detecting small physical effects due to its unique weak-value-amplification phenomenon.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.