Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Classical versus quantum calculation of radiative electric quadrupole transition rates for hydrogenic states

arXiv
Authors: Michael Horbatsch, Marko Horbatsch

Year

2021

Paper ID

63008

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The semiclassical Kepler-Coulomb problem and the quantum-mechanical Schrödinger-Coulomb problem are compared for their predictions of quadrupole E2 transitions. The semiclassical treatment involves an extension of previous work for the electric dipole transitions (Physical Review A 71, 020501), and rates are derived for Δell= 0, pm 2 transitions on the basis of the multipolar properties of the emitted radiation. For the quantum case a derivation is presented within the Schrödinger framework without reference to spin. Comparison of the E2 rates shows reasonable agreement, but not as good as was found for the electric dipole case.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The semiclassical Kepler-Coulomb problem and the quantum-mechanical Schrödinger-Coulomb problem are compared for their predictions of quadrupole E2 transitions.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63008 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.