Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Meet-in-the-Middle Attack on Feistel Construction
arXiv
Authors: Yinsong Xu, Zheng Yuan
Year
2021
Paper ID
62875
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
217
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Inspired by Hosoyamada et al.'s work [14], we propose a new quantum meet-in-the-middle (QMITM) attack on $r$-round \($r \ge 7$\) Feistel construction to reduce the time complexity. Similar to Hosoyamada et al.'s work, our attack on 7-round Feistel is also based on Guo et al.'s classical meet-in-the-middle (MITM) attack [13]. The classic MITM attack consumes a lot of time mainly in three aspects: construct the lookup table, query data and find a match. Therefore, parallel Grover search processors are used to reduce the time of constructing the lookup table. And we adjust the truncated differentials of the 5-round distinguisher proposed by Guo et al. to balance the complexities between constructing the lookup table and querying data. Finally, we introduce a quantum claw finding algorithm to find a match for reducing time. The subkeys can be recovered by this match. Furthermore, for $r$-round ($r > 7$) Feistel construction, we treat the above attack on the first 7 rounds as an inner loop and use Grover's algorithm to search the last $r-7$ rounds of subkeys as an outer loop. In summary, the total time complexity of our attack on $r$-round \($r \ge 7$\) is only $O\(2^{2n/3+(r-7\)n/4})$ less than classical and quantum attacks. Moreover, our attack belongs to Q1 model and is more practical than other quantum attacks.
Paper Tools
Show Paper
arXiv
Publisher
Sign in to cite
Sign in to compare
Sign in to copy DOI
Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.