Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Predictive Window Decoding for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Programs

arXiv
Authors: Joshua Viszlai, Jason D. Chadwick, Sarang Joshi, Gokul Subramanian Ravi, Yanjing Li, Frederic T. Chong

Year

2024

Paper ID

6286

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

148

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Real-time decoding is a key ingredient in future fault-tolerant quantum systems, yet many decoders are too slow to run in real time. Prior work has shown that parallel window decoding schemes can scalably meet throughput requirements in the presence of increasing decoding times, given enough classical resources. However, windowed decoding schemes require that some decoding tasks be delayed until others have completed, which can be problematic during time-sensitive operations such as T gate teleportation, leading to suboptimal program runtimes. To alleviate this, we introduce a speculative window decoding scheme. Taking inspiration from branch prediction in classical computer architecture our decoder utilizes a light-weight speculation step to predict data dependencies between adjacent decoding windows, allowing multiple layers of decoding tasks to be resolved simultaneously. Through a state-of-the-art compilation pipeline and a detailed simulator, we find that speculation reduces application runtimes by 40% on average compared to prior parallel window decoders.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

Category Correction Request

Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.

Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.

Log In to Submit

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6286

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.