Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Constraining modified gravity with quantum optomechanics

arXiv
Authors: Sofia Qvarfort, Dennis Rätzel, Stephen Stopyra

Year

2021

Paper ID

62706

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We derive the best possible bounds that can be placed on Yukawa- and chameleon-like modifications to the Newtonian gravitational potential with a cavity optomechanical quantum sensor. By modelling the effects on an oscillating source-sphere on the optomechanical system from first-principles, we derive the fundamental sensitivity with which these modifications can be detected in the absence of environmental noise. In particular, we take into account the large size of the optomechanical probe compared with the range of the fifth forces that we wish to probe and quantify the resulting screening effect when both the source and probe are spherical. Our results show that optomechanical systems in high vacuum could, in principle, further constrain the parameters of chameleon-like modifications to Newtonian gravity.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We derive the best possible bounds that can be placed on Yukawa- and chameleon-like modifications to the Newtonian gravitational potential with a cavity optomechanical quantum...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #62706 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.