Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Self annihilation of confined positronium
arXiv
Authors: A. R. Swann, D. G. Green, G. F. Gribakin
Year
2021
Paper ID
62617
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The effect of confinement on the self-annihilation rate of positronium is studied in three levels of approximation. Artificial restriction of the electron-positron separation leads to an increase in the annihilation rate over its vacuum value; this increase is found to diminish exponentially as the maximum separation is increased. Confinement in a hard-wall spherical cavity with the center of mass free to move throughout the cavity also increases the annihilation rate over its vacuum value; the increase depends weakly on the position of the center of mass, being larger when the center of mass is near the cavity wall. Finally, to model confinement in a pore of a microporous material, the hard wall is replaced by physically motivated electron- and positron-wall potentials; it is found that the annihilation rate is larger than its vacuum value, in contradiction to calculations of Marlotti Tanzi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 033401 (2016)] that assumed hard-wall confinement for the electrons, and experimental data.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The effect of confinement on the self-annihilation rate of positronium is studied in three levels of approximation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.