Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Thermodynamics

Extendibility limits the performance of quantum processors

arXiv
Authors: Eneet Kaur, Siddhartha Das, Mark M. Wilde, Andreas Winter

Year

2021

Paper ID

62545

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

182

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Resource theories in quantum information science are helpful for the study and quantification of the performance of information-processing tasks that involve quantum systems. These resource theories also find applications in other areas of study; e.g., the resource theories of entanglement and coherence have found use and implications in the study of quantum thermodynamics and memory effects in quantum dynamics. In this paper, we introduce the resource theory of unextendibility, which is associated to the inability of extending quantum entanglement in a given quantum state to multiple parties. The free states in this resource theory are the k-extendible states, and the free channels are k-extendible channels, which preserve the class of k-extendible states. We make use of this resource theory to derive non-asymptotic, upper bounds on the rate at which quantum communication or entanglement preservation is possible by utilizing an arbitrary quantum channel a finite number of times, along with the assistance of k-extendible channels at no cost. We then show that the bounds obtained are significantly tighter than previously known bounds for quantum communication over both the depolarizing and erasure channels.

Paper Tools

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #62545 #63286 Classical description of the pa... #63359 Confident entanglement detectio... #63357 Optimal nonequilibrium thermome... #63356 Experimental nonequilibrium mem...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.