Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Universal dynamical scaling laws in three-state quantum walks
arXiv
Authors: P. R. N. Falcão, A. R. C. Buarque, W. S. Dias, G. M. A. Almeida, M. L. Lyra
Year
2021
Paper ID
62168
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We perform a finite-time scaling analysis over the detrapping point of a three-state quantum walk on the line. The coin operator is parameterized by ρ that controls the wavepacket spreading velocity. The input state prepared at the origin is set as symmetric linear combination of two eigenstates of the coin operator with a characteristic mixing angle θ, one of them being the component that results in full spreading occurring at θc(ρ) for which no fraction of the wavepacket remains trapped near the initial position. We show that relevant quantities such as the survival probability and the participation ratio assume single parameter scaling forms at the vicinity of the detrapping angle θc. In particular, we show that the participation ratio grows linearly in time with a logarithmic correction, thus shedding light on previous reports of sublinear behavior.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We perform a finite-time scaling analysis over the detrapping point of a three-state quantum walk on the line.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.