!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum Markov monogamy inequalities
arXiv
Authors: Matheus Capela, Lucas C. Céleri, Rafael Chaves, Kavan Modi
Year
2021
Paper ID
62070
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
151
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Markovianity lies at the heart of communication problems. This in turn makes the information-theoretic characterization of Markov processes worthwhile. Data processing inequalities are ubiquitous in this sense, assigning necessary conditions for all Markov processes. We address here the problem of the information-theoretic analysis of constraints on Markov processes in the quantum regime. We show the existence of a novel class of quantum data processing inequalities called here quantum Markov monogamy inequalities. This new class of necessary conditions on quantum Markov processes is inspired by its counterpart for classical Markov processes, and thus providing a strong link between classical and quantum constraints on Markovianity. We go on to construct a family of multitime quantum Markov monogamy inequalities, based on the process tensor formalism and that exploits multitime correlations. We then show, by means of an explicit example, that the Markov monogamy inequalities can be stronger than the usual quantum data processing inequalities.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Markovianity lies at the heart of communication problems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.