Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Glimmers of a post-geometric perspective
arXiv
Authors: Federico Piazza
Year
2021
Paper ID
62023
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
203
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum gravitational effects can become important at low energy if the wavefunction of the metric field fails to be peaked around a classical configuration. We try to understand such deviations from classicality within canonical quantum gravity by introducing a "fluid of observers" in the low energy theory and defining a distance operator "at equal time" among them. We find that, even in the presence of relevant fluctuations in the metric field, a locally flat limit is recovered in the neighbourhood of each observer. Deviations from classicality have no particular consequence, locally. However, at larger separations the expectation value of the distance operator behaves differently than a standard Riemannian distance. In particular, it is non-additive and thus cannot be obtained by the integral of a differential line element. This emerging "beyond Riemannian" geometry is a metric space similar to embedded Riemannian manifolds equipped with chord distances that cut through the ambient space. We study deviations from flat space by looking at triangles in the limit where their sizes go to zero. Beyond-Riemannian deviations with respect to flat space are of the same order as standard Riemannian ones, but qualitatively different. Possible connections with holography and with the black hole information paradox are briefly discussed.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum gravitational effects can become important at low energy if the wavefunction of the metric field fails to be peaked around a classical configuration.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.