Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Beating standard quantum limit via two-axis magnetic susceptibility measurement

arXiv
Authors: Zheng-An Wang, Yi Peng, Dapeng Yu, Heng Fan

Year

2021

Paper ID

61906

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

107

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report a metrology scheme which measures magnetic susceptibility of an atomic spin ensemble along the x and z direction and produces parameter estimation with precision beating the standard quantum limit. The atomic ensemble is initialized via one-axis spin squeezing with optimized squeezing time and parameter φ to be estimated is assumed as uniformly distributed between 0 and 2π. One estimation of φ can be produced with every two magnetic susceptibility data measured along the two axis respectively, which has imprecision scaling \(1.43pm{}0.02\)/N0.687pm0.003 with respect to the number N of atomic spins. The measurement scheme is easy to implement and thus one step towards practical application of quantum metrology.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report a metrology scheme which measures magnetic susceptibility of an atomic spin ensemble along the x and z direction and produces parameter estimation with precision...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61906 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.