Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Common Coherence Witnesses and Common Coherent States

arXiv
Authors: Bang-Hai Wang, Zi-Heng Ding, Zhihao Ma, Shao-Ming Fei

Year

2021

Paper ID

61791

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

137

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We show the properties and characterization of coherence witnesses. We show methods for constructing coherence witnesses for an arbitrary coherent state. We investigate the problem of finding common coherence witnesses for certain class of states. We show that finitely many different witnesses W1, W2, cdots, Wn can detect some common coherent states if and only if sumi=1ntiWi is still a witnesses for any nonnegative numbers ti\(i=1,2,cdots,n\). We show coherent states play the role of high-level witnesses. Thus, the common state problem is changed into the question of when different high-level witnesses (coherent states) can detect the same coherence witnesses. Moreover, we show a coherent state and its robust state have no common coherence witness and give a general way to construct optimal coherence witnesses for any comparable states.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We show the properties and characterization of coherence witnesses.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61791 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.