You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Polynomial scaling enhancement in ground-state preparation of Ising spin models via counter-diabatic driving

arXiv
Authors: Andreas Hartmann, Glen Bigan Mbeng, Wolfgang Lechner

Year

2021

Paper ID

61649

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

87

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The preparation of ground states of spin systems is a fundamental operation in quantum computing and serves as the basis of adiabatic quantum computing. This form of quantum computation is subject to the adiabatic theorem which in turn poses a fundamental speed limit. We show that by employing diabatic transitions via counter diabatic driving a less strict requirement on adiabaticity applies. We demonstrate a scaling advantage from local and multi-spin counter diabatic driving in the ground-state fidelity compared to their adiabatic counterpart, for different Ising spin models.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The preparation of ground states of spin systems is a fundamental operation in quantum computing and serves as the basis of adiabatic quantum computing.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61649 #69028 Unified Framework for Functiona... #69026 Bures geodesics for non-faithfu... #69024 Cyclic ladder operators and hid... #69021 Nonreciprocal optomechanical en...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.