Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Direct Fidelity Estimation for Generic Quantum States
arXiv
Authors: Christopher Vairogs, Bin Yan
Year
2024
Paper ID
6161
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Verifying the proper preparation of quantum states is essential in modern quantum information science. Various protocols have been developed to estimate the fidelity of quantum states produced by different parties. Direct fidelity estimation is a leading approach, as it typically requires a number of measurements that scale linearly with the Hilbert space dimension, making it far more efficient than full state tomography. In this article, we introduce a novel fidelity estimation protocol for generic quantum states, with an overall computational cost that scales only as the square root of the Hilbert space dimension. Furthermore, our protocol significantly reduces the number of required measurements and the communication cost between parties to finite. This protocol leverages the quantum amplitude estimation algorithm in conjunction with classical shadow tomography to achieve these improvements.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Verifying the proper preparation of quantum states is essential in modern quantum information science.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.