You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
From no causal loop to absoluteness of cause: discarding the quantum NOT logic
arXiv
Authors: Anandamay Das Bhowmik, Preeti Parashar, Guruprasad Kar, Manik Banik
Year
2021
Paper ID
61402
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
172
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The principle of `absoluteness of cause' (AC) assumes the cause-effect relation to be observer independent and is a distinct assertion than prohibiting occurrence of any causal loop. Here, we study implication of this novel principle to derive a fundamental no-go result in quantum world. AC principle restrains the `time order' of two spacelike separated events/processes to be a potential cause of another event in their common future, and in turn negates existence of a quantum device that transforms an arbitrary pure state to its orthogonal one. The present {\it no-go} result is quite general as its domain of applicability stretches out from the standard linear quantum theory to any of its generalizations allowing deterministic or stochastic nonlinear evolution. We also analyze different possibilities of violating the AC principle in generalized probability theory framework. A strong form of violation enables instantaneous signaling, whereas a weak form of violation forbids the theory to be locally tomographic. On the other hand, impossibility of an intermediate violation suffices to discard the universal quantum NOT logic.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The principle of `absoluteness of cause' (AC) assumes the cause-effect relation to be observer independent and is a distinct assertion than prohibiting occurrence of any causal...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.