You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Bounds on approximating Max kXOR with quantum and classical local algorithms
arXiv
Authors: Kunal Marwaha, Stuart Hadfield
Year
2021
Paper ID
61355
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
214
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider the power of local algorithms for approximately solving Max kXOR, a generalization of two constraint satisfaction problems previously studied with classical and quantum algorithms (MaxCut and Max E3LIN2). In Max kXOR each constraint is the XOR of exactly k variables and a parity bit. On instances with either random signs (parities) or no overlapping clauses and D+1 clauses per variable, we calculate the expected satisfying fraction of the depth-1 QAOA from Farhi et al [arXiv:1411.4028] and compare with a generalization of the local threshold algorithm from Hirvonen et al [arXiv:1402.2543]. Notably, the quantum algorithm outperforms the threshold algorithm for k > 4. On the other hand, we highlight potential difficulties for the QAOA to achieve computational quantum advantage on this problem. We first compute a tight upper bound on the maximum satisfying fraction of nearly all large random regular Max kXOR instances by numerically calculating the ground state energy density P(k) of a mean-field k-spin glass [arXiv:1606.02365]. The upper bound grows with k much faster than the performance of both one-local algorithms. We also identify a new obstruction result for low-depth quantum circuits (including the QAOA) when k=3, generalizing a result of Bravyi et al [arXiv:1910.08980] when k=2. We conjecture that a similar obstruction exists for all k.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider the power of local algorithms for approximately solving Max kXOR, a generalization of two constraint satisfaction problems previously studied with classical and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.