Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Perfect State Transfer in Weighted Cubelike Graphs

arXiv
Authors: Jaideep Mulherkar, Rishikant Rajdeepak, V. Sunitha

Year

2021

Paper ID

61257

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

147

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A continuous-time quantum random walk describes the motion of a quantum mechanical particle on an underlying graph. The graph itself is associated with a Hilbert space of dimension equal to the number of vertices. The dynamics of the walk is governed by the unitary operator mathcal{U}(t) = eiAt, where A is the adjacency matrix of the graph. An important notion in the quantum random walk is the transfer of a quantum state from one vertex to another. If the fidelity of the transfer is unity, we call it a perfect state transfer. Many graph families have been shown to admit PST or periodicity, including cubelike graphs. These graphs are unweighted. In this paper, we generalize the PST or periodicity of cubelike graphs to that of weighted cubelike graphs. We characterize the weights for which they admit PST or show periodicity, both at time t=fracπ{2}.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A continuous-time quantum random walk describes the motion of a quantum mechanical particle on an underlying graph.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61257 #68472 Non-equilibirum physics of dens... #68468 Error Exponents for Quantum Pac... #68462 Quantum Speed Limit under Calib... #68459 Expanding quantum magnetic field

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.