Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Perfect State Transfer in Weighted Cubelike Graphs
arXiv
Authors: Jaideep Mulherkar, Rishikant Rajdeepak, V. Sunitha
Year
2021
Paper ID
61257
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A continuous-time quantum random walk describes the motion of a quantum mechanical particle on an underlying graph. The graph itself is associated with a Hilbert space of dimension equal to the number of vertices. The dynamics of the walk is governed by the unitary operator mathcal{U}(t) = eiAt, where A is the adjacency matrix of the graph. An important notion in the quantum random walk is the transfer of a quantum state from one vertex to another. If the fidelity of the transfer is unity, we call it a perfect state transfer. Many graph families have been shown to admit PST or periodicity, including cubelike graphs. These graphs are unweighted. In this paper, we generalize the PST or periodicity of cubelike graphs to that of weighted cubelike graphs. We characterize the weights for which they admit PST or show periodicity, both at time t=fracπ{2}.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A continuous-time quantum random walk describes the motion of a quantum mechanical particle on an underlying graph.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.