Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Estimation of Wigner distribution of single mode Gaussian states: a comparative study
arXiv
Authors: Chandan Kumar, Arvind
Year
2021
Paper ID
61246
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
173
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we consider the estimation of single mode Gaussian states using four different measurement schemes namely: i) homodyne measurement, ii) sequential measurement, iii) Arthurs-Kelly scheme, and iv) heterodyne measurement, with a view to compare their relative performance. To that end, we work in the phase space formalism, specifically at the covariance matrix level, which provides an elegant and intuitive way to explicitly carry out involved calculations. We show that the optimal performance of the Arthurs-Kelly scheme and the sequential measurement is equal to the heterodyne measurement. While the heterodyne measurement outperforms the homodyne measurement in the mean estimation of squeezed state ensemble, the homodyne measurement outperforms the heterodyne measurement for variance estimation of squeezed state ensemble up to a certain range of squeezing parameter. We then modify the Hamiltonian in the Arthurs-Kelly scheme, such that the two meters can have correlations and show that the optimal performance is achieved when the meters are uncorrelated. We expect that the results will be useful in analyzing various quantum information and quantum communication protocols.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we consider the estimation of single mode Gaussian states using four different measurement schemes namely: i) homodyne measurement, ii) sequential measurement...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.