Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Faster and More Reliable Quantum SWAPs via Native Gates
arXiv
Authors: Pranav Gokhale, Teague Tomesh, Martin Suchara, Frederic T. Chong
Year
2021
Paper ID
61219
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Due to the sparse connectivity of superconducting quantum computers, qubit communication via SWAP gates accounts for the vast majority of overhead in quantum programs. We introduce a method for improving the speed and reliability of SWAPs at the level of the superconducting hardware's native gateset. Our method relies on four techniques: 1) SWAP Orientation, 2) Cross-Gate Pulse Cancellation, 3) Commutation through Cross-Resonance, and 4) Cross-Resonance Polarity. Importantly, our Optimized SWAP is bootstrapped from the pre-calibrated gates, and therefore incurs zero calibration overhead. We experimentally evaluate our optimizations with Qiskit Pulse on IBM hardware. Our Optimized SWAP is 11% faster and 13% more reliable than the Standard SWAP. We also experimentally validate our optimizations on application-level benchmarks. Due to (a) the multiplicatively compounding gains from improved SWAPs and (b) the frequency of SWAPs, we observe typical improvements in success probability of 10-40%. The Optimized SWAP is available through the SuperstaQ platform.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Due to the sparse connectivity of superconducting quantum computers, qubit communication via SWAP gates accounts for the vast majority of overhead in quantum programs.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.