You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Machine Learning

Design of quantum optical experiments with logic artificial intelligence

arXiv
Authors: Alba Cervera-Lierta, Mario Krenn, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Year

2021

Paper ID

61210

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

188

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Logic Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a subfield of AI where variables can take two defined arguments, True or False, and are arranged in clauses that follow the rules of formal logic. Several problems that span from physical systems to mathematical conjectures can be encoded into these clauses and solved by checking their satisfiability (SAT). In contrast to machine learning approaches where the results can be approximations or local minima, Logic AI delivers formal and mathematically exact solutions to those problems. In this work, we propose the use of logic AI for the design of optical quantum experiments. We show how to map into a SAT problem the experimental preparation of an arbitrary quantum state and propose a logic-based algorithm, called Klaus, to find an interpretable representation of the photonic setup that generates it. We compare the performance of Klaus with the state-of-the-art algorithm for this purpose based on continuous optimization. We also combine both logic and numeric strategies to find that the use of logic AI significantly improves the resolution of this problem, paving the path to developing more formal-based approaches in the context of quantum physics experiments.

Paper Tools

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61210 #63359 Confident entanglement detectio... #63357 Optimal nonequilibrium thermome... #63352 Multiplexed telecom-band quantu... #63351 Extending the spin coherence li...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.