Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Uniqueness in a Navier-Stokes-nonlinear-Schrödinger model of superfluidity

arXiv
Authors: Pranava Chaitanya Jayanti, Konstantina Trivisa

Year

2021

Paper ID

61158

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In a previous paper [Jayanti, P.C., Trivisa, K. Local Existence of Solutions to a Navier-Stokes-Nonlinear-Schrödinger Model of Superfluidity. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 24, 46 (2022)], the authors proved the existence of local-in-time weak solutions to a model of superfluidity. The system of governing equations was derived by Pitaevskii in 1959 and couples the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS) and the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE). In this article, we prove a weak-strong type uniqueness theorem for these weak solutions. Only some of their regularity properties are used, allowing room for improved existence theorems in the future, with compatible uniqueness results.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In a previous paper [Jayanti, P.C., Trivisa, K.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61158 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.