Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Divide-and-conquer verification method for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computation
arXiv
Authors: Yuki Takeuchi, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Tomoyuki Morimae, Seiichiro Tani
Year
2021
Paper ID
61115
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
191
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Several noisy intermediate-scale quantum computations can be regarded as logarithmic-depth quantum circuits on a sparse quantum computing chip, where two-qubit gates can be directly applied on only some pairs of qubits. In this paper, we propose a method to efficiently verify such noisy intermediate-scale quantum computation. To this end, we first characterize small-scale quantum operations with respect to the diamond norm. Then by using these characterized quantum operations, we estimate the fidelity langleψt|hatρrm out|ψtrangle between an actual n-qubit output state hatρrm out obtained from the noisy intermediate-scale quantum computation and the ideal output state (i.e., the target state) |ψtrangle. Although the direct fidelity estimation method requires O\(2n\) copies of hatρrm out on average, our method requires only O\(D3212D\) copies even in the worst case, where D is the denseness of |ψtrangle. For logarithmic-depth quantum circuits on a sparse chip, D is at most O\(log{n}\), and thus O\(D3212D\) is a polynomial in n. By using the IBM Manila 5-qubit chip, we also perform a proof-of-principle experiment to observe the practical performance of our method.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Several noisy intermediate-scale quantum computations can be regarded as logarithmic-depth quantum circuits on a sparse quantum computing chip, where two-qubit gates can be...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.