Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Gravity-related collapse of the wave function and spontaneous heating: revisiting the experimental bounds
arXiv
Authors: Andrea Vinante, Hendrik Ulbricht
Year
2021
Paper ID
61112
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
205
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The possibility that the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics is a real and ultimately connected to (classical) gravity has been debated for decades, with main contributions by Diósi and Penrose. In particular, Diósi proposed a noise-based dynamical reduction model, which captures the same orders of magnitude for the collapse time suggested by Penrose based on heuristic arguments. This is known in literature as the DP model (Diósi-Penrose). A peculiarity of the DP model is the prediction of spontaneous heating of matter, which can be tested without the need for massive quantum superpositions. Notably, a very similar effect is predicted by recent theoretical approaches to gravity as a classical-only information channel. Here, we reconsider the current constraints on the DP model from spontaneous heating, by analyzing experimental situations not properly considered before. We argue that the the parameter-free version of the DP model is close to be ruled out by standard heat leak measurements at ultralow temperature, with a conclusive exclusion likely within reach with existing technology. This result would strengthen a recent claim of exclusion inferred by spontaneous x-ray emission experiments, which relies on the somewhat stronger assumption that the DP noise field is white up to x-ray frequencies.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The possibility that the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics is a real and ultimately connected to (classical) gravity has been debated for decades, with main...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.