Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Maximum-Likelihood Quantum State Tomography by Cover's Method with Non-Asymptotic Analysis

arXiv
Authors: Chien-Ming Lin, Hao-Chung Cheng, Yen-Huan Li

Year

2021

Paper ID

61058

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

111

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose an iterative algorithm that computes the maximum-likelihood estimate in quantum state tomography. The optimization error of the algorithm converges to zero at an O ( ( 1 / k ) log D ) rate, where k denotes the number of iterations and D denotes the dimension of the quantum state. The per-iteration computational complexity of the algorithm is O \(D ^ 3 + N D 2\), where N denotes the number of measurement outcomes. The algorithm can be considered as a parameter-free correction of the R ρR method \[A. I. Lvovsky. Iterative maximum-likelihood reconstruction in quantum homodyne tomography. J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 2004\] \[G. Molina-Terriza et al. Triggered qutrits for quantum communication protocols. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004.\].

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose an iterative algorithm that computes the maximum-likelihood estimate in quantum state tomography.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #61058 #69028 Unified Framework for Functiona... #69026 Bures geodesics for non-faithfu... #69024 Cyclic ladder operators and hid... #69021 Nonreciprocal optomechanical en...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.