Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Coherence-Sensitive Readout Models for Quantum Devices: Beyond the Classical Assignment Matrix
arXiv
Authors: Zachariah Malik, Zain Saleem
Year
2025
Paper ID
6099
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
201
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Readout error models for noisy quantum devices almost universally assume that measurement noise is classical: the measurement statistics are obtained from the ideal computational-basis populations by a column-stochastic assignment matrix A. This description is equivalent to assuming that the effective positive-operator-valued measurement (POVM) is diagonal in the measurement basis, and therefore completely insensitive to quantum coherences. We relax this assumption and derive a fully general expression for the observed measurement probabilities under arbitrary completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) noise preceding a computational-basis measurement. Writing the ideal post-circuit stat ρ in terms of its populations x and coherences y, we show that the observed probability vector z satisfies z = A x + C y, where A is the familiar classical assignment matrix and C is a coherence-response matrix constructed from the off-diagonal matrix elements of the effective POVM in the computational basis. The classical model z = A x arises if and only if all POVM elements are diagonal; in this sense C quantifies accessible information about coherent readout distortions and interference between computational-basis states, all of which are invisible to models that retain only A. This work therefore provides a natural, fully general framework for coherence-sensitive readout modeling on current and future quantum devices.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Readout error models for noisy quantum devices almost universally assume that measurement noise is classical: the measurement statistics are obtained from the ideal...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.