Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum Walks Assisted Bidirectional Remote State Preparation
arXiv
Authors: K. K. Naseeda, Jumana Muhammed Abdul Asharaf, N. C. Randeep
Year
2026
Paper ID
60959
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
113
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a scheme for bidirectional remote state preparation (BRSP) using quantum walks on two independent one-dimensional lattices and two independent cycles with two and four vertices, employing nearest-neighbor jumps with coin outcomes. The protocol is implemented in two distinct ways: one without the involvement of a controller and the other assisted by a controller . In this approach, the quantum walk dynamics generate entanglement during the remote state preparation process, thereby eliminating the need for any pre-shared initial entanglement between the communicating parties. Finally, we show that the bidirectional remote state preparation schemes based on quantum walks on a two-vertex and four-vertex system exhibit consistent behavior under the respective uncontrolled and controlled configurations.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a scheme for bidirectional remote state preparation (BRSP) using quantum walks on two independent one-dimensional lattices and two independent cycles with two and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.