Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Expectation Pauli-Lubanski vector and intrinsic angular momentum of relativistic wavepackets
arXiv
Authors: Konstantin Y. Bliokh
Year
2026
Paper ID
60044
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
161
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In non-relativistic mechanics, the total (orbital) angular momentum (AM) of a spatially-distributed system can be decomposed into intrinsic and extrinsic contributions. In relativistic quantum mechanics, intrinsic AM is typically associated with spin, which can be described using the Pauli-Lubanski four-vector. Here, we develop a unified formalism that combines the main features of both approaches and describes the intrinsic AM of a relativistic wavepacket, including both spin and orbital contributions. Our approach is based on the "expectation Pauli-Lubanski vector" constructed from the expectation values of the wavepacket's momentum and AM. Equivalently, it defines the intrinsic AM relative to the wavepacket's energy centroid. In contrast to the conventional Pauli-Lubanski formalism, the zero-mass singularity does not occur for the expectation Pauli-Lubanski vector. Consequently, the intrinsic AM of a wavepacket may have an arbitrary orientation with respect to its momentum, even for massless particles. We illustrate the general theory with a number of examples of relativistic wave beams and packets carrying spin and orbital AM.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In non-relativistic mechanics, the total (orbital) angular momentum (AM) of a spatially-distributed system can be decomposed into intrinsic and extrinsic contributions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.