Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

Readout failures in superconducting qubits due to TLS-defects in tunnel junctions

arXiv
Authors: J. Lisenfeld, A. K. Händel, A. Bilmes, A. V. Ustinov

Year

2026

Paper ID

59985

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

115

Citations

0

Abstract

Material defects give rise to parasitic two-level systems (TLS) which present a major source of decoherence in superconducting qubits. Here, we study a strongly coupled TLS that resides in the tunnel barrier of transmon qubit. We use multi-photon spectroscopy and TLS strain tuning to explore the rich spectrum of the interacting three-partite system consisting of TLS, qubit, and its readout resonator. This reveals a strong effective resonant coupling between the TLS and the qubit's readout resonator which dresses the resonator states and results in a resonance frequency shift that spoils the readout signal. Our finding presents yet another way how material defects can interfere with qubit operation and hinder the realization of solid-state quantum processors.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Material defects give rise to parasitic two-level systems (TLS) which present a major source of decoherence in superconducting qubits.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #59985 #69931 Dynamical Decoupling using Univ... #69914 Optimizing Pump Conditions of P...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-07-02 02:17:32

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.