Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Computation of entanglement for quantum states by a Consensus-Based Optimization method

arXiv
Authors: Michael Herty, Yijia Tang, Yizhou Zhou

Year

2026

Paper ID

59910

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

0

Abstract

The computation of quantum entanglement can be formulated as a high-dimensional nonconvex optimization problem with orthogonality constraints. In this work, we propose structure-preserving consensus-based optimization (CBO) methods for entanglement computation, with one approach based on a Hermitian formulation and the other evolving directly on the unitary manifold. To handle the variable dimension of the feasible set, we introduce a cross-dimensional interaction mechanism allowing exchange of information between particles of different sizes. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods achieve accurate approximations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The computation of quantum entanglement can be formulated as a high-dimensional nonconvex optimization problem with orthogonality constraints.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #59910 #69028 Unified Framework for Functiona... #69026 Bures geodesics for non-faithfu... #69024 Cyclic ladder operators and hid... #69021 Nonreciprocal optomechanical en...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-13 11:31:23

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.