Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Data processing makes POVMs coarser and observational entropies larger
arXiv
Authors: Adam Teixidó-Bonfill
Year
2022
Paper ID
59448
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
95
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We find a criterion to compare POVM measurements and decide which ones can extract more information from physical systems, with coarser POVMs always extracting less information. This criteria generalizes the previous definition of coarser POVM, and is motivated by the idea that information cannot be gained by processing the measurement outcomes. The information that a measurement cannot extract is quantified by observational entropy or coarse-grained entropy. Adequately, coarser measurements have larger observational entropies. Moreover, the characterization and properties of coarser measurements that we provide allow to straightforwardly derive several previously known results about observational entropy.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We find a criterion to compare POVM measurements and decide which ones can extract more information from physical systems, with coarser POVMs always extracting less information.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.