Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Efficient Calculation of NMR Shielding Constants Using Composite Method Approximations and Locally Dense Basis Sets
arXiv
Authors: Jiashu Liang, Zhe Wang, Jie Li, Jonathan Wong, Xiao Liu, Brad Ganoe, Teresa Head-Gordon, Martin Head-Gordon
Year
2022
Paper ID
59443
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic study of applying composite method approximations with locally dense basis sets (LDBS) to efficiently calculate NMR shielding constants in small and medium-sized molecules. The pcSseg-n series of basis sets are shown to have similar accuracy to the pcS-n series when n geq1 and can slightly reduce compute costs. We identify two different LDBS partition schemes that perform very effectively for density functional calculations. We select a large subset of the recent NS372 database containing 290 H, C, N, and O shielding values evaluated by reference methods on 106 molecules to carefully assess methods of the high, medium, and low compute costs to make practical recommendations. Our assessment covers conventional electronic structure methods (DFT and wavefunction) with global basis calculations, as well as their use in one of the satisfactory LDBS approaches, and a range of composite approaches, also with and without LDBS. Altogether 99 methods are evaluated. On this basis, we recommend different methods to reach three different levels of accuracy and time requirements across the four nuclei considered.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper presents a systematic study of applying composite method approximations with locally dense basis sets (LDBS) to efficiently calculate NMR shielding constants in...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.