Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Sub-system self-consistency in coupled cluster theory

arXiv
Authors: Karol Kowalski

Year

2022

Paper ID

59437

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

113

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this Communication, we provide numerical evidence indicating that the standard single-reference coupled-cluster (CC) energies can be calculated alternatively to its copybook definition. We demonstrate that the CC energies can be reconstructed by diagonalizing the effective Hamiltonians describing correlated sub-systems of the many-body system. In the extreme case, we provide numerical evidence that the CC energy can be reproduced through the diagonalization of the effective Hamiltonian describing sub-system composed of a single electron. These properties of CC formalism can be exploited to design protocols to define effective interactions in sub-systems used as a probe to calculate the energy of the entire system and introduce a new type of self-consistency for approximate CC approaches.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this Communication, we provide numerical evidence indicating that the standard single-reference coupled-cluster (CC) energies can be calculated alternatively to its copybook...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #59437 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.