Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
A quantum logic gate for free electrons
arXiv
Authors: Stefan Löffler, Thomas Schachinger, Peter Hartel, Peng-Han Lu, Rafal E. Dunin-Borkowski, Martin Obermair, Manuel Dries, Dagmar Gerthsen, Peter Schattschneider
Year
2022
Paper ID
59307
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
107
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The topological charge m of vortex electrons spans an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. Selecting a two-dimensional subspace spanned by m=pm 1, a beam electron in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) can be considered as a quantum bit (qubit) freely propagating in the column. A combination of electron optical quadrupole lenses can serve as a universal device to manipulate such qubits at the experimenter's discretion. We set up a TEM probe forming lens system as a quantum gate and demonstrate its action numerically and experimentally. High-end TEMs with aberration correctors are a promising platform for such experiments, opening the way to study quantum logic gates in the electron microscope.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The topological charge m of vortex electrons spans an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.