Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

FV-Train: Quantum Convolutional Neural Network Training with a Finite Number of Qubits by Extracting Diverse Features

arXiv
Authors: Hankyul Baek, Won Joon Yun, Joongheon Kim

Year

2022

Paper ID

59215

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum convolutional neural network (QCNN) has just become as an emerging research topic as we experience the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era and beyond. As convolutional filters in QCNN extract intrinsic feature using quantum-based ansatz, it should use only finite number of qubits to prevent barren plateaus, and it introduces the lack of the feature information. In this paper, we propose a novel QCNN training algorithm to optimize feature extraction while using only a finite number of qubits, which is called fidelity-variation training (FV-Training).

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum convolutional neural network (QCNN) has just become as an emerging research topic as we experience the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era and beyond.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #59215 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69584 OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Con... #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69539 Learning ground state observabl...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.