Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Indistinguishable photons from a two-photon cascade
arXiv
Authors: Timon L. Baltisberger, Francesco Salusti, Mark R. Hogg, Malwina A. Marczak, Nils Heinisch, Sascha R. Valentin, Stefan Schumacher, Arne Ludwig, Klaus D. Jöns, Richard J. Warburton
Year
2025
Paper ID
5919
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
111
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Decay of a four-level diamond scheme via a cascade is a potential source of entangled photon pairs. A solid-state implementation is the biexciton cascade in a semiconductor quantum dot. While high entanglement fidelities have been demonstrated, the two photons, XX and X, are temporally correlated, typically resulting in poor photon coherence. Here, we demonstrate a high two-photon interference visibility (a measure of the photon coherence) for both XX V=94$pm$2% and X V=82$pm$6% photons. This is achieved by Purcell-enhancing the biexciton transition in a low-noise device. We find that the photon coherence follows the well-known quantum optics result upon tuning the XX:X lifetime ratio over two orders of magnitude.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Decay of a four-level diamond scheme via a cascade is a potential source of entangled photon pairs.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.